CO129-387 - Individuals - 1911 — Page 287

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Home.

51 241

The sub-section 2 of Section 561 of the Ordinance, you sent out vide your letter No. 1711 of 15th October 1908, on reference No. 3571/05 and brought it into uniformity with the corresponding provision in the Straits Settlement.

See despatch No. 33991/08 and the annotated copy of the rules thereto annexed.

On 15th October 1908, the official referred to in your letter No. 357/65 was informed of the order as amended. I assumed that Section 2 of the Ordinance was modified to bring it into uniformity with the Straits Order 19 of 1904.

The two sections therefore have the same meaning and intent. I do not know whether Mr. Young has been consulted with the Straits Order and if so, whether he has recorded his views with regard to it; and, if not, whether he should have recorded it with regard to the other.

The staff cannot of course "decide" the meaning of the question raised by the Judge, but if he does decide that it should be amended so as to make it clear.

I submit that the said Section of the Ordinance should be amended in a similar fashion.

M. Collins, 27/9, directs that the Ordinance be amended, observing that the words in question were doubtless inserted through some misunderstanding, and informs Young, asking him to approve of his taking action on the assumption that the Ordinance will be amended.

M. Johnson, 25/1, and others.

I am sorry to trouble you.

Grad X Thaits made amendment home.

M. Emmerhans, 022 148 1905. (27040/05). The more necessary it is to refer to 594 27 with regard to a similar amendment.

2/2

All the contingencies referred to are seconded in 961/11 who will fall under the class referred to.

Jan. 24. 21

Page 51

241

...

Page 52

...

Page 53

Edit History

2026-06-11 02:32:07 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Home.51 241The sub-section 2 of Section 561 of the Ordinance, you sent out vide your letter No. 1711 of 15th October 1908, on reference No. 3571/05 and brought it into uniformity with the corresponding provision in the Straits Settlement.See despatch No. 33991/08 and the annotated copy of the rules thereto annexed.On 15th October 1908, the official referred to in your letter No. 357/65 was informed of the order as amended. I assumed that Section 2 of the Ordinance was modified to bring it into uniformity with the Straits Order 19 of 1904.The two sections therefore have the same meaning and intent. I do not know whether Mr. Young has been consulted with the Straits Order and if so, whether he has recorded his views with regard to it; and, if not, whether he should have recorded it with regard to the other.The staff cannot of course "decide" the meaning of the question raised by the Judge, but if he does decide that it should be amended so as to make it clear.I submit that the said Section of the Ordinance should be amended in a similar fashion.M. Collins, 27/9, directs that the Ordinance be amended, observing that the words in question were doubtless inserted through some misunderstanding, and informs Young, asking him to approve of his taking action on the assumption that the Ordinance will be amended.M. Johnson, 25/1, and others.I am sorry to trouble you.Grad X Thaits made amendment home.M. Emmerhans, 022 148 1905. (27040/05). The more necessary it is to refer to 594 27 with regard to a similar amendment.2/2All the contingencies referred to are seconded in 961/11 who will fall under the class referred to.Jan. 24. 21Page 51241...Page 52...Page 53
Baseline (Original)
?home.51 241The de libentit, modifus $561 of the off, you sent out ad fie1711) of order 15 of 1908,C on 3571/05 and brought it, into unformity with the corresponding provision in the Strait nou -See desp 33991/08 o the annotatio cofe of the rides therets annexed.MF. Exaustuing15% 1908 the off rider sunt out on 357/65 Was of the order as curarted, on I assumed that $5(2) ofmodified. the Saine livesin Bc (8-4.80 40 to to uniform with the Straits outer 19 of 1904.The two section therefore leave the Same meaning15cA. and intent. I do not know whether me." June has been concessed with the Straits ond" and if so whether the racked this front with regard to see it of that not; and, if not, whey he shed han racord it withregjerdTI not with regard to the other.The soff cannot of Te 18Theto one.cours "decide" the mesanथोड़ansucy of aquested by the young, but if he doco decide that it shio to amended so matre it'sWe Rusneyماa lolearI submit that tsse de ofthe Shimili ade she to amended is a fimilar flu-acM Collins279? Direct for. It key to ameand Ord. observing that the words in questim were doubtles mitter through some misunderstanding, two inform to Young orking him to approving of his task kim to proceed assumption that the Ord. will boar amendedMinferringheiMstell frv.M L20/areGu728/1M. Johnson.25/1JaI am sorry Do pon'tlar RSLamewhen5276/05byGrad X Thaits amendment hommemedeM. Emmer hans, 022 148 1905. (27040/05). The more nathopers. ૨you at the necessay 594 27 with Love2/2*similar amendmentall the contingencies Tomy refered to AreJecond in 961/11 who will fall class refores*i88 of 23 15 of 1908 Jan2.4.21
2026-06-11 02:32:07 · Baseline
View content

?

home.

51 241

The de libentit, modifus $561 of the off, you sent out

ad fie

1711) of order 15 of 1908,

C

on 3571/05 and brought it,

into unformity with the corresponding provision in the

Strait nou - See desp

33991/08

o the annotatio cofe of the rides therets annexed.

M

F. Exaustuing

15% 1908 the off rider sunt out on 357/65 Was

of the order as curarted, on

I assumed that $5(2) of

modified. the Saine lives

in Bc (8

-

4.80 40

to to uniform with the Straits outer 19 of 1904.

The two section therefore leave the

Same meaning

15c

A.

and intent. I do not know whether me." June has been concessed with the Straits ond" and if so

whether the racked this front with regard to see it of that not; and, if not, whey he shed han racord it with regjerd

T

I not with regard to the other.

The soff cannot of

Te 18

The

to one.

cours "decide" the mesan

थोड़

ansucy of

aquested by the young, but if he

doco decide that it shio to amended so

matre it's

We Rusney

ما

a lo

lear

I submit that

t

sse de ofthe Shimili ade she to amended is

a fimilar flu-ac

M Collins

279

? Direct for. It key to ameand Ord. observing that the words in questim

were doubtles mitter through some misunderstanding, two inform to Young orking him to approving of his task kim to proceed assumption that the Ord. will boar amended

M

inferring

hei

M

stell frv.

M L

20/

are

Gu728/1

M. Johnson.

25/1

Ja

I am sorry

Do pon't

lar RS

Lame

when

5276/05

by

Grad

X Thaits

amendment

homme

mede

M. Emmer hans,

022 148 1905. (27040/05). The more nat

hopers. ૨

you at the necessay 594 27

with Love

2/2

*

similar amendment

all the contingencies

Tomy refered to

Are

Jecond

in 961/11

who

will fall

class refores

*

i88 of 23 15 of 1908 Jan

2.4.21

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.